typewriter

Editorial services

Proofreading


 
The website for writers
WritersServices has over 1800 pages
To help you find
Search
Contents
FAQs
Editorial Services
 
 
 
 
Print and supply
New writers
Fed-up with rejection
Published authors
Office services
Cost & ordering
Some writers' stories

Editorial Services

Services
Up
Which service?
Choosing a service
Preparing for submission
Submissions
Submission package
The Slush pile
Top Ten Tips
Be Positive
Finding an Agent
Getting poetry published
Working with an Agent
Prepare for Criticism
Preparing for Publication
American copy editing
Proofreading
Ins & outs of Indexing
Writing for the web
Entering competitions
Business of writing
PEN Masterclasses

Exchange calculator

Manual process

 

 

 

Proofreader's marks

There are 3 main ways to mark up a proof to indicate errors or changes:

1. Marginal marks

These are the classic way to mark up a manuscript. The advantage is that they are well understood by those involved in the book business. The drawback is the need for a paper copy and for the changes to be entered manually. In the era when typesetting was a specialist trade, this system made sense.  Marginal marks

If your typescript is corrected in the traditional way on 'hard copy' (i.e. paper), it will come back to you with the copy editor’s changes marked up and you can decide whether to implement them or not. If you are self-publishing, you will then have to input the changes to produce a clean copy.  If your work is being published by a publisher, then the publisher usually gets the typesetter to input the changes. (See Preparing for Publication)

If you are correcting the proofs of your book for a publisher, then the editor will put your corrections and those of the proof-reader onto one set of proofs. Use the attached proofreader's marks  or electronic proof marks to understand the corrections which have been marked up. 

2. Electronic mark-up

The advantage is that editors and proofreaders can work on screen on a digital version of the manuscript. The drawback is that it is not very good for layout as the person working on the script can make the changes without leaving a trace. If this is the method being used, we would advise you to read through the manuscript or proofs very carefully to make sure that you are happy with all the changes.

It could be argued that there is less chance to control the changes and check that they are appropriate. There is no standard for electronic mark-up, so a hybrid is offered.  Electronic mark-up 

3. Track Changes and Compare

Most word-processor software offers the facility to compare two documents. The advantage is that the writer can see the changes and accept or reject each one. The drawback is that there must be a high degree of software compatibility for this to work for the proofreader and for the person checking the changes. 

If this is the chosen approach, you will get a disk of the edited manuscript or proofs with the changes marked up.  You can use the track changes facility to check through the changes on screen and decide which ones to implement.

Preparing for publication provides some general background on copy editing and proofreading.

Advice for writers lists many other pages which will help you prepare your work for publication.

 

© Chris Holifield 2005

Site navigation

Printshop button
Get a print estimate

 

 

Order check-list

1 Order form

2 Sending material

3 Payment

Payment options

Services Stories Ordering Exchange calculator

Pricing table

Frequently asked questions about our Services WritersServices can help you prepare for publication WritersPrintShop to self-publish and market your work

Services for writers

Search

Contents

Site map

Feedback

We operate from the UK and under the financial rules and regulations of the UK

©WritersServices.com 2001-10